

Small and special | The Battle for Control of Cromwell House
Thus was created a dichotomy of rule at Cromwell House, which dogged its management for several years, with the Matron/Housekeeper lined up against the Superintendent of Nurses. Periodic reviews of the responsibilities of these two women indicate the tensions which existed between them. In April 1871 the Management Committee was forced to spell out this relationship in simple terms: that Miss Wood held the same position relative to Miss Hall that the ward sisters at Great Ormond Street held relative to the Lady Superintendent, Miss Vizard. In other words, although she had full responsibility for the running of the sick wards, Miss Wood ultimately had to answer to Miss Hall. The wrangling continued, and in early 1872 Miss Hall resigned, perhaps worn down by the situation. However, she returned almost immediately, and for several years everything seemed to run smoothly. Then it was Miss Wood’s turn to resign, in January 1876 – giving a very generous six months notice. Unable to find a replacement despite asking for help from some of the most influential nursing figures of the time, the Management Committee were informed by an unnamed source (who was possibly Dr West) that Miss Wood might be persuaded to stay. However, there were some conditions: firstly that she be made Lady Superintendent of Cromwell House, and secondly that she be allowed to engage a lady of her choice as her assistant. The Committee agreed to everything. Miss Hall became surplus to requirements in this new vision for the management of Cromwell House, and having failed to do the decent thing and resign, she was given formal notice to quit by the Management Committee. (It is interesting to note that that the Committee were not unanimous in this decision.) Miss Wood, on the other hand, continued in her new role until the end of 1868, when she was appointed Lady Superintendent for Great Ormond Street. © Kingston University 2007 |
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust